Sussex is one of the counties which appears to suffer most from an identity crisis. Originating as an Anglo-Saxon kingdom, the county was first recorded by name in 722. Always a single entity, Sussex has, however, been divided administratively since 1585. This arrangement was maintained in 1889 when the county received one council to administer the east and another the west but at no time was the county itself ever divided, a fact borne out by the existence of the single Sussex county cricket team. It is perhaps the high profile of the two councils that has led many people to think that there are separate counties on the south coast between Hampshire and Kent; each has borne distinctive arms, and banners based on these or other council emblems, have been commercially available as so called “county flags”, to further confuse the issue and mislead the public. The registration of the Sussex flag on May 20th 2011, to represent the one single county entity has hopefully helped to dispel such misunderstandings and reaffirm the fact that there is only one Sussex. It is also often ignored that there are several further administrations running matters in the county, in Brighton, East Grinstead, Haywards Heath and eastern Crawley, entirely separate from the remits of East or West Sussex councils, demonstrating the fallacy of the notion that there are two distinct counties, based on local administration.
That the flag may help to focus on the county’s real identity was demonstrated by a letter that appeared in a local publication shortly after its registration on June 12th 2011 calling for just one Sussex council;
“I am encouraged to see further movement towards reuniting the counties of East and West Sussex. ….Lewes Castle on Saturday was flying a ‘traditional’ Sussex flag…… Do we really need two Chief Executives, two Directors of Corporate Resources… Kent manages with just one of each, yet has a population size roughly the same as that of East and West Sussex combined….. In these times of reduced central Government grants to councils could this be the way to make considerable savings?…” .
Sussex’s flag of 6 gold martlets, essentially a heraldic representation of a swallow, on a blue background, appeared as a county emblem in John Speed’s 1611 Atlas The Theatre of the Empire of Great Britaine to represent the kingdom of the South Saxons, from whom the name Sussex is derived. It is depicted twice on the map of the Anglo-Saxon heptarchy
(when England consisted of seven kingdoms), both over the ancient Kingdom of Sussex and once in the border decoration, as shown below.
The Sussex emblem also featured on the atlas’s title page
In 1622 a Latin version of the atlas was produced and curiously on this occasion the same emblem appeared coloured red
Such vagaries of colour and form are typical of early heraldry when often the interpretation of arms was left to personal choice but given the range of martlet shields considered as the likeliest sources for the design taken up by Sussex, which are examined further on, the choice of red in the 1622 edition of the atlas is markedly idiosyncratic, one wonders what prompted this seemingly odd choice. And in fact the shields on the heptarchy map in the 1622 version remained blue, which proved over time to be the preferred colour choice for the emblem. Curiously the birds have no feet, which may arise from the old belief that the swallow was always in flight!
Although heraldry did not actually appear until the period of the Middle Ages, mediaeval heralds commonly attributed arms to people and places of high repute from the pre-heraldic era, a practice duly followed by John Speed in his Atlas. Kent’s association with its white horse had been described in a 1605 work, suggesting a linkage dating back to the foundation of the kingdom turned county by Jutish invaders; Speed’s use of this emblem was obvious but the Sussex martlets have a more nebulous origin. It has often been the case that the arms of families of great repute or status have become strongly associated with the counties where they reside; the checks of Surrey and the swan of Buckinghamshire are typical examples, both now deployed as the respective flags of those counties. Sussex’s martlets probably arose in like manner as the personal arms of a man of high importance locally, although there are several viable contenders as the source of the Sussex arms which John Speed depicted in his atlas.
One common theory regarding the origin of the Sussex martlets is that the emblem was linked to the Norman family, de Arundel, who bore arms that were black with six silver or white martlets.
The arms, featuring swallows, which in French is “hirondelles”, are an example of a punning or canting practice, whereby objects on arms are used because they sound similar to the name of the family or locality bearing them. The family name being ascribed to the town and locality of Arundel, which comprised a large portion of the county of Sussex, the family and its arms duly became strongly associated with the county. However, aside from the similarity of the arms this theory lacks substance; the name of the town is more likely to derive from the Celtic name of the “River Arun”, combined with Anglo-Saxon “dell” and the family’s major holdings were in Somerset, Dorset and Wiltshire, linkage with Sussex is negligible.
W.S.Ellis in Volume 37 of the Sussex Archaeological Collections (pages 177-183) (1880) offers a view that the Sussex martlets appeared on the seal of an early Sheriff of Sussex, a “seal” being a device used to seal letters and documents with hot wax, which features a distinct emblem or pattern that is embossed into the hot wax and so indicates who sent the letter or signifies the authority of a document. The arrangement of the martlets on the seal being subsequently retained by his successors as an insignia of this important local office, a tradition grew that the county was represented by six martlets and that these were in effect the “official” county arms.
An early appearance of the six martlets in the county is on the gatehouse of Bodiam Castle, built in 1385, the furthest right of the trio of shields.
In his 1831“A Graphical and Historical Sketch of Bodyam” William Cotton attributes these arms to the Wardeux /Wardieu family of Bodiam and describes them as six gold martlets on black.
John Wardieu’s daughter and heiress, Elizabeth, married Sir John (de) Radynden, born about 1274, whose own arms were described by eighteenth century antiquarian Sir William Burrell, who conducted widespread research into the history of Sussex, as having six silver martlets on blue.
In its 1990 guide to Bodiam Castle, the National Trust (page 31) whilst agreeing on the colour scheme described by William Cotton, states that the arms are those of Sir John de Radynden. John de Radynden’s daughter Alice married the castle’s owner Sir Roger Dallynrigg and the martlets likely appear in consequence of this union and Dallynrigg’s inheritance of a great estate from his wife’s father. It has been a matter of some debate whether the arms carved into the masonry at Bodiam are those of Wardieu or de Radynden; notwithstanding William Cotton’s assertion, it does seem more likely that they represent de Radynden, the castle owner’s immediate benefactor and father-in-law. However, given that the de Radynden and Wardieu familes were themselves so closely connected, in the words of W.S Ellis, “Possibly this coat had a cognate origin with that of Wardeux”.
John de Radynden was a man of some significance in Sussex. An account of his life was provided by Sir Charles Thomas-Stanford in 1921 in “The Manor of Radynden” Vol 62 of the Sussex Archaeological Collections (pages 64-92). From 1316 he served as commissioner of array, with a remit to gather inhabitants and ready them for military service. He was then selected as Knight of the Shire for the county in 1319 and sat in various parliaments until 1329. In 1325 he was part of the enterprise which provided 20 men-at-arms from Surrey and Sussex to serve in Gasconny and was instructed to organise the lighting of signal beacons and deployment of watchmen. The following year he selected 140 armed Sussex footmen and 400 archers for battle in France and was still active in county affairs aged seventy. With the troops he mustered for battle gathering under his coat of arms, there was likely to have been a well developed association of the de Radynden insignia and the county where he was so influential. As Charles Thomas-Stanford conjectures, continuing W.S.Ellis’s proposition, “It may be that a seal of the Knight of the Shire was affixed to some document relating to county affairs, and that the use continued.” A plaque was affixed to a pillar, apparently in the 1930s, to mark the site of the ancient Radynden Manor which is now covered by Preston Park, a public space.
The plaque reads,
“RADYNDEN GATE THE ANCIENT MANOR OF RADYNDEN LAY TO THE SOUTH OF THIS GATE ABOVE ARE THE ARMS OF SIR JOHN DE RADYNDEN 1274 – 1350 SINCE ASSUMED BY THE COUNTY OF SUSSEX”
unequivocally declaring de Radynden as the source of the county arms.
Interestingly, the de Radynden arms themselves appear to have undergone something of a development. Several works of heraldry refer to the de Radynden arms bearing ten martlets. This is recorded in both the 1828 Enyclopaedia Heraldica by William Berry
and the 1830 “The British Herald” by Thomas Robson
alongside twelve martlets for a similarly named individual in Gloucestershire who was presumably related, perhaps cousins sharing a basic theme in slight variations. Although it should be noted that in the genealogical work “Plantagent Ancestry” by Douglas Richardson and Kimball G. Everingham, page 230, there is a reference to “Dallingridge”, Knight of Bodiam and Knight of the Shire for Sussex, who also held the position of Sheriff of Gloucestershire
Given that de Radynden married Dallynrigg’s daughter and inherited Bodiam Castle and estates from Dallynrigg and that de Radynden also became Knight of the Shire for Sussex, it is not inconceivable that members of these two closely linked families occupied identical roles over time, including the office of Sheriff of Gloucestershire; the de Radynden named in the above works would therefore indeed be the one and the same individual from Sussex. If true it would suggest that the arms he used in Gloucestershire bore twelve martlets
whilst those he used in Sussex featured ten,
which is certainly unusual.
The 1829 publication “A Roll of Arms, of the Reign of Edward the Second.” by Nicolas H. Nicholas reproduced a heraldic roll from 1312, “The Great Roll” or “Bannerets Roll”, which includes details of the arms of a Gloucestershire “Ratendene”
but none for Sussex, suggesting that perhaps the Gloucestershire version was the original. Notably, the description here is “semee” meaning distributed across the field. Generally “semee” suggests a widespread, unordered distribution
but it’s not a great stretch from there to an arrangement of twelve
or ten martletsand from there, to a reduction to the six
noted by William Burrell, which may simply have been more practical to reproduce.
The six martlets are today held to symbolise Sussex’s six medieval administrative areas (termed “rapes”) of Chichester, Arundel, Bramber, Lewes, Pevensey and Hastings. Of course the Sussex martlets are yellow (gold) but white and yellow are probably easily mistaken from a distance or even a simple aging process could make the white martlets on a coloured version of the arms appear yellow with the patina of age, the error being compounded through repetition over the following centuries.
The evidence for a de Radynden origin of the Sussex emblem therefore is strong, however two further candidates for the source of the Sussex arms can be considered. Amongst the work of Nicholas Charles or Carles, a seventeenth century officer of arms, are notes about the arms decorating “Wythiham” Church in Sussex. His account, which preceded the church’s near destruction by lightning strike in June 1663 where the martlets noted by Charles were lost, was included in the 1837 publication, “Collectanea Topographica Et Genealogica, Volume 4”: it includes a reference to a coat of arms described as “Azure, six martlets, 3,2,1, Or.”
that is , identical to the modern emblem and flag of Sussex!. Also part of the description, with a question mark, is the name Appleby.
The De Appleby arms were recorded on Segar’s Roll, a record of arms dating from c.1282 which was copied in the seventeenth century and would certainly have been known by Nicholas Charles but the De Appleby family was based in Leicestershire and appears to have had no link with Sussex. Markedly however, Bolebrook Manor in the adjacent parish of Hartfield, as seen on the map at left below, was owned by the de Radynden family and it does seem more likely that the device illustrated in the church was the arms of a locally important family, rather than a distant set of people with no obvious link to the county. The map at right indicates the proximity of De Radynden’s Bolebrook Manor to Withyham Church, where Nicholas Charles found the martlets device. If these arms were, in fact, de Radynden’s this would indicate that the martlets had become yellow or gold by the early 1600’s, in fact, shortly before Speed depicted them in this colour.
Finally, one heraldic roll dating from the reign of Henry (III 1216-1272), as appears in Joseph Foster’s 1902 work “The Dictionary of Heraldry”, page 145, records the arms of a John Le Moines
which are also emblazoned as “Azure, six martlets, 3,2,1 or” that is, blue with six gold martlets. No further information regarding these arms, their owner or any specific connection with Sussex is evident.
The centuries old emblem of Sussex is therefore comparable to the emblems of other former kingdoms turned counties, Kent and Essex, found in John Speed’s Atlas, and the latter’s offshoot, Middlesex. When the Flag Registry was first established in the early years of the 21st century, flags for these counties based on their historically attested emblems were included as traditional flags and one might have similarly expected the Sussex flag to be included. However, it was not and only appeared there roughly a decade later owing to the efforts of county residents Dave and Brady Ells (seen below) who campaigned intensely for its inclusion as another such traditional flag.
The Ells established a magnificently researched and lavishly illustrated Sussex flag website to argue their case and enlisted the support of the Association of British Counties (ABC). The wealth of evidence they amassed on their website was decisive and the flag was duly registered by the Flag Institute, giving the Sussex flag its rightful slot alongside other traditional designs like Cornwall, Kent and Essex.
The registration was completed in time for the Sussex flag to fly outside Eland House, the offices of the Department of Communities and Local Government, (DCLG) in 2011
on Sussex Day, June 16th, the feast day of Saint Richard of Chichester, the county’s patron saint.
As might be expected martlets or swallows appear in the arms of the town of Arundel, at left below and also feature in a border on the arms of Brighton, at right.
Other Sussex towns bearing martlets include Hove, at the base of the shield and on a border, at left below; Bexhill with six gold martlets on a blue border, centre below and Bognor Regis at right, with three blue martlets in chief.
The 6 gold martlets on a blue field are used by a great number of organisations in the county. The following sample includes, left to right, top row; Sussex County Cricket Club, Sussex County Football Association, Sussex Cyclists’ Association; Sussex Boxing Association; second row, Sussex Archaeological Trust (seen below at Lewes Castle); Sussex Yeomanry; Sussex Archery Association; third row, Sussex County Women’s Bowls Association; Sussex County Table Tennis Association; Sussex County Scouts (old badge); Sussex County Athletics; bottom row, Sussex County Bowling Association; Sussex Association of Local Councils; Sussex Association of Scottish Societies; The Martlet Partnership LLP.
See Sussex Flag from which this selection comes, for a fuller listing of those county bodies which use the martlets emblem. Also of particular interest are two plaques
today on the wall of a school in Tunbridge Wells, located on the Kent and Sussex boundary,
which were formerly to be found on the Kent and Sussex Hospital
that previously occupied the site and served both counties.
As noted, armorial banners representing East and West Sussex Councils have been and continue to be, sold and are often erroneously identified as county flags. The former arms of West Sussex council
date from pre 1975, when they were changed following a reorganisation of the council’s administrative territory. A banner of these former arms
is commercially available but in fact represents only the council, who once bore them – it is not a county flag. The council itself in 2007, promoted a different and poorly designed flag
to celebrate Sussex Day but it also is not a county flag.
The current arms of East Sussex council
date from 1975, at the time of the same reorganisation, and a banner of these arms
is also commercially available. It too represents only East Sussex council, it is not a county flag.
Because of the principal colours featured in the arms of these two councils, a misconception has arisen that red is the colour of the eastern part of the county and blue of the west. In fact, as demonstrated, this is not the case at all – the colours of the council arms have no bearing on the traditional colour and design of the Sussex emblem and the county flag based upon it. There is actually clear evidence of the use of the whole Sussex blue emblem in the east, to confound and disprove this misunderstanding, as demonstrated by the aforementioned use of the blue plaque on the wall of the Kent and Sussex Hospital in Tonbridge Wells as well as the many following examples.
From left to right below are, at top, emblems adorning Lewes town hall and another on its council offices, built in 1913; the sign of Ringmer village in the east and the insignia of Ringmer Football Club; below, the insignia of Ewhurst & Staplecross Bonfire Society (located in the east of the county) and the insignia of Uckfield Bonfire & Carnival Society (located in the east of the county); the badges of Catsfield football club and the Warbleton Brass Band, both again, located in the east of the county.
Further information regarding the council banners, highlighting how they are not county flags, can be found here.
Two other designs have been proposed as Sussex flags and one other curious version exists.
This flag won a BBC Southern Counties Radio competition to design a flag for Sussex, held in June 2008.
As it was divided red and blue, it again reflected the misconception regarding the east and west of the county being represented by different colours, so was wholly inappropriate in perpetuating this myth, as described.
This flag was proposed by the “Sussex Party”, formed to campaign for a Sussex Parliament. The flag is split into four bands.
The first band (Blue) represents the sky, the second band (Green) represents the South Downs, the third band (Yellow) is representative of the beaches and the fourth band (Blue) is the sea. The yellow circle in the top left-hand corner represents the Sun.
This simplistic design had no distinct Sussex symbolism or historical context and again, was entirely unnecessary in any case.
Finally this curious crimson coloured version of the Sussex flag
is available from JWPlant. Presumably this has been developed on the basis of the red version of the Sussex emblem, which appeared on the title page of the 1622 Latin version of John Speed’s atlas – see above. Whilst not wholly unattractive it is not of course, the registered county flag!
The Sussex flag has now become one of the most popular and commonly seen county flags in the UK and is regularly and commonly seen across the county. A flag twelve feet in length was raised over Lewes Castle
and it flies in Chichester
The flag has also been enthusiastically taken up by fans at Brighton and Hove Albion
and at Eastbourne Town FC.
Residents of Sussex also celebrate their county day with marked enthusiasm and the flag is much in evidence each June 16th!